Examination SystemEvaluation & Grading
Examination Module 4 of 5

Precise Evaluation & Grading System

Combine auto-grading for objective questions with structured manual evaluation for subjective answers — all in a unified, transparent, and auditable workflow.

Auto
MCQ Grading
Rubric
Subjective
0 Bias
Blind Mode

Evaluation Panel

Data Structures · End-Sem · 124 Students

78 / 124 done
Evaluation Progress63%

Aanya Sharma

CS2101

In Progress

Q1 (20M)

18

Q2 (20M)

14

Q3 (20M)

Total

Rohan Mehta

CS2102

Evaluated

Q1 (20M)

20

Q2 (20M)

16

Q3 (20M)

18

Total

54

Priya Iyer

CS2103

Pending

Q1 (20M)

17

Q2 (20M)

Q3 (20M)

Total

Karan Patel

CS2104

Evaluated

Q1 (20M)

19

Q2 (20M)

15

Q3 (20M)

16

Total

50

Active Rubric: Q3 — Algorithm Explanation

Correctness
7/8
Explanation clarity
5/6
Example given
4/4
Notation
2/2
Core Features

Fair, Fast & Fully Transparent

Auto Evaluation (MCQ)

MCQ and objective answers auto-graded the moment students submit — instant, error-free, and scalable to thousands.

Manual Grading (Subjective)

Faculty grade subjective answers in a dedicated panel with side-by-side answer sheet and model answer view.

Rubric-based Grading

Define grading rubrics with criteria and score levels. Consistent, transparent, and defensible evaluation.

Re-evaluation Workflows

Students can apply for re-evaluation. Workflow routes to a second examiner with full audit trail.

Blind Evaluation Mode

Anonymize student identity during evaluation to eliminate bias and ensure fair assessment.

CO Attainment Mapping

Every graded answer is mapped to its CO — feeding directly into attainment calculation and OBE reports.

Evaluation Workflow

Every Answer Gets a Fair Hearing

Instant MCQ results

Auto-graded the moment submission happens — no waiting, no manual counting, no errors.

Side-by-side evaluation

Faculty see student answer and model answer side by side — reducing fatigue and improving consistency.

Score override with reason

Faculty can override auto-grades with mandatory comments — maintaining accountability and audit trail.

Batch evaluation analytics

Track evaluation progress across the faculty team — see who's done, who's behind, and average scores.

Re-evaluation request portal

Students submit re-evaluation requests online. Second examiner assigned automatically with deadline tracking.

Moderation & finalization

HoD can moderate marks distribution before final result is locked and published.

Grade Thousands of Papers Without the Grind

Combine automation with structured manual workflows to evaluate faster, fairer, and with full accountability.